Aflevering ??Checks And Balance: Affirmative Reaction

· Aflevering van de podcast: Economist Radio

Next term the Supreme Court will hear two cases challenging race-conscious admissions programmes. The court’s conservative supermajority is likely to rule for the plaintiffs. What difference would a ban on affirmative action make to higher education in America? The Economist’s Tamara Gilkes Borr explains how she switched from opposing to supporting affirmative action. We tell the story of the man who coined the term. And The Economist’s Steve Mazie takes us through the Supreme Court cases, and considers if the process for replacing Justice Stephen Breyer is a form of affirmative action. John Prideaux presents with Charlotte Howard and Idrees Kahloon. For full access to print, digital and audio editions as well as exclusive live events, subscribe to The Economist at economist.com/uspod See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Speelgoedwinkel
Economist Radio

Economist Radio

Gemaakt door: Onbekend Eerste aflevering: 10-10-2020

De podcast Economist Radio heeft in totaal 2365 afleveringen

Vorige aflevering

Withdrawal symptoms: Afghanistan goes hungry

Withdrawal symptoms: Afghanistan goes hungry

Maker: Onbekend Datum: 11-02-2022

Volgende aflevering

Not trucking around: Canada’s protests spread

Not trucking around: Canada’s protests spread

Maker: Onbekend Datum: 14-02-2022

Soortgelijke podcasts

Disclaimer: De podcast (artwork) is geembed op deze pagina en is het eigendom van de eigenaar/ maker van de podcast. Deze is niet op enige wijze geaffilieeerd met Online-Radio.nl. Voor reclamering dient u zich te wenden tot de eigenaar/ maker van deze podcast.

??Checks and Balance: Affirmative reaction

Economist Radio · 11-02-2022

00:00 00:42:35